Commonwealth v. Nunez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgments of sentence after convictions in a jury trial for second-degree murder and conspiracy to murder. Appellant contends that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; and (2) the court below erred in not suppressing a statement given by appellant. 1 We disagree with appellant’s contentions and affirm the judgments of sentence.
To evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, accept as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences upon which,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. YostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. YuknavichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. OrlowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.