James G. Kappos v. Craig Hanks
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
James Kappos filed a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he alleged that his murder conviction was obtained in violation of the Constitution. He raises four issues on appeal: the failure of the trial court to give a cautionary jury instruction, the failure of the prosecution to disclose the terms of a “bounty deal,” prose-cutorial misconduct and the submission of a jury instruction that, he alleges, improperly relieved the state of its burden of proof. 1
I
The evidence at trial established that Kap-pos hired David Hayes to kill his wife, Charlene…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cargle v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. RecendizCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Michael A. Newell v. Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Brad J. Lieberman v. Odie Washington, Warden of Dixon Correctional Center and Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director of Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.