Legal Opinion

James G. Kappos v. Craig Hanks

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 2, 1995No. 92-3844PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

James Kappos filed a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he alleged that his murder conviction was obtained in violation of the Constitution. He raises four issues on appeal: the failure of the trial court to give a cautionary jury instruction, the failure of the prosecution to disclose the terms of a “bounty deal,” prose-cutorial misconduct and the submission of a jury instruction that, he alleges, improperly relieved the state of its burden of proof. 1

I

The evidence at trial established that Kap-pos hired David Hayes to kill his wife, Charlene…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cargle v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. RecendizCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Michael A. Newell v. Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Brad J. Lieberman v. Odie Washington, Warden of Dixon Correctional Center and Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director of Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API