American University v. Forbes
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
There would be no question of the plaintiff’s right to recover, had it brought its claim to the executor’s notice while estate remained in the latter’s hands. The claim was a provable debt. Although it was not payable during the decedent’s lifetime, it became due upon her death. It was thus subject to the legislation (P. L., c. 302, ss. 1-5) relating to notice and suit. And the right to a judgment against the executor, under the statute (P. L., c. 302, s. 28) enacting that the time for notice be extended under certain stated conditions, would be clear but for the provision in the statute that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Redington Hub Co. v. PutnamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
- Thyng v. MosesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
- Sawyer v. JeftsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Henkle v. HenkleOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Northern Natural Gas Company v. GroundsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968
- Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Clapp v. Goffstown School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.