Legal Opinion

State v. Flores

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2017No. 201411281; A158090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

In this criminal case, defendant challenges his convictions for two counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411, two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, two counts of first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, and two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. In his sole assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting, pursuant to the common-law curative admissibility doctrine, conclusions from a crime lab report regarding DNA analysis of the victim’s clothing. The state argues that the conclusions from the crime lab report were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. Schiller-MunnemanOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. BasuaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WirkkalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. RajsavongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API