Legal Opinion
Gableman v. Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
Decided October 21, 1897No. 414PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
This is an action by Louis J. Gablentan, Sr., to recover damages íór loss of the services of his infant son, in consequence of injuries received by him through the alleged negligence of the Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Company, Edward O. Hopkins, receiver of said railway company, and George Colvin, an engineer in the employ of the receiver. The injury occurred while the railway was in the exclusive control and management of the receiver. The railway company is improperly joined as a party defendant. The complaint states no cause of action against it. It is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Bock v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chappell v. WaterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anding v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Gableman v. Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Willson v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Lockard v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1909
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. BaileyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Georgia · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.