Legal Opinion
Kinross v. Utah Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 22, 2004No. 02-4192PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Utah Railway Company appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against it and in favor of its former employee, William Kinross. The district court held Mr. Kinross did not receive due process in the course of an Arbitration Board’s review of his wrongful termination claim. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, reverse the district court, and remand the case for further proceedings.
Background
Mr. Kinross worked for Utah Railway for twenty-one years and was a member of the United Transportation Union. Sometime in 1998, he inquired about…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, Central RegionSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Australian Gold, Inc. v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sorrentino v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Eatinger v. BP America Production Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen, General Committee of Adjustment, Central Region v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.