Legal Opinion
Keefe Co. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 10, 1979No. 79-386PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Associate Judge:
Petitioner, Keefe Company, a consulting firm and registered lobbyist, challenges the determination of the D.C. Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Adjustment (herein BZA), that the Company is not a “similar professional person” within the Revised Special Purpose (SP) District Zoning Regulation § 4101.44 (1978). 1 Ap pellant urges that: (1) in interpreting the meaning and intent of § 4101.44, the Zoning Administrator and the BZA engaged in “rule making" under the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act (DCAPA) without complying with the procedural…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Salsbery v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Bernstein v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Association for Preservation of 1700 Block of N Street v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Concerned Citizens of Brentwood v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Becker v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Perkins v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- McMahon v. Anderson, Hibey and BlairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.