Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 92-0033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

This is a review of an award denying medical benefits for surgery to treat hyperparathyroidism (“PTH”) and related kidney stones. The Administrative Law Judge (“A.L.J.”) found that these conditions are unrelated to the industrial back injury and surgeries. The issue on appeal is whether the treatment of the unrelated condition is compensable when the unrelated condition would independently require treatment notwithstanding the industrial injury. In this case, the unrelated condition will worsen the industrial injury and its treatment is a prerequisite to the treatment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Rank v. LindblomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Cullins v. sequel/pmaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API