Legal Opinion

Cullins v. sequel/pma

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 18, 2017No. 1 CA-IC 16-0022Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE DONNA L. CULLINS, Petitioner, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, SEQUEL YOUTH AND FAMILY, Respondent Employer, PMA c/o GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, Respondent Carrier. No. 1 CA-IC 16-0022 FILED 4-18-2017 Special Action – Industrial Commission ICA Claim No. 20130-500189 Carrier Claim No. 011975-079287-WC-01 Deborah Nye, Administrative Law Judge AWARD AFFIRMED COUNSEL…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Carousel Snack Bar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Yates v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Norris v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API