Landis v. Curtis & Jones Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 58, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1907, No. 53, on verdict for defendant in case of Stuart R. Landis, by his next friend and father, Levi S. Landis, v. Curtis & Jones Company, Incorporated. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Ermentrout, P. J. At the trial the jury under binding instructions returned a verdict for defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 58, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1907, No. 53, on verdict for defendant in case of Stuart R. Landis, by his next friend and father, Levi S. Landis, v. Curtis & Jones Company, Incorporated. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Ermentrout, P. J. At the trial the jury under binding instructions returned a verdict for defendant. On rule for a new trial Endlich, P. J., filed the following opinion : At the close of the evidence on the trial of this cause before the late President Judge Ermentrout, he affirmed a point…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
It is demonstrated by the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas that the plaintiff failed to make out a case.
The judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- McCreery v. Westmoreland Farm Bureau Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Curt v. ZimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Jose A. Rodriguez v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Szanborsky v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932