Legal Opinion

Morselling v. Frankel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), dated April 10, 1989, which denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants’ contentions, the plaintiffs carried their burden of establishing a prima facie case of "serious injury” pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 237; cf., Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017). In opposition to the defendants’ motion for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Francis v. Basic Metal Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Bates v. PeeplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Moore v. TappenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Georgia v. RamautarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Jackson v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API