Legal Opinion
Health Cost Controls v. Skinner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 5, 1995No. 94-1433PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Health Cost Controls (“HCC”) commenced this action under section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). It seeks to enforce the terms of an employee benefit plan. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Richard Skinner and his daughter, Sharon Skinner, are participants in an employee welfare benefit plan (“the Plan”) established by the Mobil Oil Corporation. H.M.O. Illinois, Inc. (“HMO Illinois”) provides managed care services for some…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jass v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States of America and Eunice Mathews v. Bank of FarmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Health Cost Controls of Illinois, Inc. v. Valerie WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Willie May Anthony v. Security Pacific Financial Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Daniel Brosted v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Dreisilker Electric Motors, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.