Legal Opinion

Huntsman Chemical Corp. v. Tri/Insul Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Hughes, J.), entered September 9, 1991 in Albany County, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for, inter alia, failure to state a cause of action.

Defendant is a domestic corporation located in the City of Albany. Plaintiffs, Huntsman Chemical Corporation and Huntsman Chemical Company of Canada, Inc., are parent company and wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company, respectively; they are both foreign corporations. In June 1991, plaintiffs commenced this action seeking monetary damages *1003based upon, inter alia, a claim for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Matco Electric Co. v. Plaza Del Sol Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. American Lithographic Co. v. Dorrance-Sullivan & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Halpern v. HalpernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fern v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. I. Shulman & Son, Inc. v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Canavan v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Anonymous B. v. Anonymous R.New York Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API