Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Newegg.com Ams., Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided July 31, 2018No. B271477PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZelon, Acting P.J.
*719Plaintiff M. George Hansen filed false advertising claims under the unfair competition law ( Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 ), the false advertising law ( Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500 et seq . ) and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act ( Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq . ) alleging that electronics retailer Newegg.com used fictitious former price information in its advertisements that mislead customers to believe they were receiving merchandise at a discounted price. Hansen further alleged that he had relied on fictitious former price information in making two purchases from Newegg's website, and that he…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Shaulis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Akes v. Beiersdorf, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Campbell v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Carvalho v. HP, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Coffee v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- In Re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Prods. Mktg., Sales Practices & Liab. Litig.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.