In re Rosenbluth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCapozzoli, J.
Respondent’s motion to modify a prior order of suspension so as to permit him to continue the operation of a calendar watching service during the course of his suspension, which was held in abeyance pending the receipt of a Referee’s report upon the nature and extent of the services to be rendered by respondent, is now granted. The Referee’s report which, in part, states that “ the operation of the calendar service * * * does not appear to require activities on respondent’s part, which would be violative of the order of suspension ”, is confirmed. The operative facts have been adequately set…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re BikmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical GroupDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015