Legal Opinion

Grancare, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1998No. 96-5838, 96-6086Published

1Concurrence

■ NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I concur in my colleague’s well reasoned opinion. I write briefly to emphasize that the determination of whether charge nurses are supervisors under the National Labor *377Relations Act, is a highly-fact bound issue. See, e.g., NLRB v. Res-Care, Inc., 705 F.2d 1461, 1468 (7th Cir.1983) (noting that the application of section 2(11) has given rise to extensive but highly-fact bound litigation, and thus other decisions involving nurses provide little guidance). Therefore, each ease must be scrutinized and resolved individually. Although this court has…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API