Legal Opinion

Siegley v. Nakata

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1918No. 14361Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered February 28, 1917, upon findings in favor of one of the defendants, upon a cross-complaint, in an action to quiet title, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

The plaintiff in this action is not concerned in this appeal. The validity of his claim against *74the real estate in question is not denied by any of the defendants. The contest in the court below was waged between defendants Kelley and wife, on the one hand, and defendant Nakata, on the other, upon issues raised by their respective cross-complaints, seeking to quiet title as against each other, and their respective answers to such cross-complaints.

Nakata claimed title through a sheriff’s deed made to him as purchaser at sheriff’s sale, under an execution issued upon a judgment rendered in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sakai v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Michaelson v. OvermeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kelley v. SakaiWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Humes v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Austin v. PetrovitskyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API