Legal Opinion
Wilson v. San Luis Obispo County
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 2011No. B224269PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*921Opinion
YEGAN, Acting P. J.
The San Luis Obispo County Democratic Central Committee (Committee) appeals from a postjudgment order denying its motion for reasonable attorney fees under the “private attorney general statute,” Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 (section 1021.5). The Committee made the motion after prevailing in an appeal filed by Gail Wilson, respondent. This court decided the appeal in a published opinion, Wilson v. San Luis Obispo County Democratic Central Com. (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 489 [96 Cal.Rptr.3d 332] (Wilson I).
Respondent was a member of the Committee. Litigation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Vasquez v. CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samantha C. v. State Department of Developmental ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Azure Limited v. I-Flow Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Doe v. The Regents of the Univ. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Grossmont Union High School Dist. v. Diego Plus Education Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2023