Legal Opinion
Azure Limited v. I-Flow Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 2012No. G046048PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
Plaintiff Azure Limited (Azure) appeals the trial court’s denial of its pre- and postjudgment motions for attorney fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5.1 We affirm. In essence, this was a private dispute between two corporate parties over hundreds of thousands of dollars in economic losses. Because the resolution of the case happened to turn in part on the interpretation of the Unclaimed Property Law (UPL) (§ 1500 et seq.), Azure’s tenacious pursuit of its interests resulted in a Supreme Court opinion bearing on the rights of all property owners whose…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Serrano v. Stefan Merli Plastering Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Adoption of Joshua S.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Azure Ltd. v. I-Flow Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Harris v. Verizon CommunicationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pasadena Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Pasadena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Central Delta Water Agency v. Dept. of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Central Delta Water Agency v. Dept. of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018