Legal Opinion

Pavek v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided September 14, 1987No. 07-86-0313-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Appellant Carol Pavek brings this appeal from a denial of the relief she sought by her pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus to be released from a charge of committing an act prohibited by the recently enacted statute regulating lay midwives. See Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4512i (Vernon Supp.1987). Appellant contends the prohibition is cast in unconstitutionally vague language and, therefore, cannot form the basis for a criminal prosecution. Although the State, represented by the Potter County Attorney, has not challenged appellant’s contention in this Court,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Campos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wooten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  2. Henry Walter Wooten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  3. Travis Mitchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API