Legal Opinion

Piccirillo v. Board of Appeals on Zoning

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 8, 1952PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The defendant Lustig is the owner of premises with a building thereon at 754 Madison Avenue in Bridgeport. The property is in a business number 1 zone, where the keeping, slaughtering, selling and marketing of live poultry, a designated heavy industrial use, is prohibited under the city’s zoning regulations. Bridgeport Zoning Regs. (1949) e. 9, § 3(q); c. 10, § 3(b). On October 25, 1950, the *118defendant board of appeals granted Lustig a waiver of the above restriction, permitting him to carry on such activities upon his premises for a period of two years. The plaintiff, as owner and occupant of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Gregorio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Farr v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Culinary Institute of America, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API