Piccirillo v. Board of Appeals on Zoning
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The defendant Lustig is the owner of premises with a building thereon at 754 Madison Avenue in Bridgeport. The property is in a business number 1 zone, where the keeping, slaughtering, selling and marketing of live poultry, a designated heavy industrial use, is prohibited under the city’s zoning regulations. Bridgeport Zoning Regs. (1949) e. 9, § 3(q); c. 10, § 3(b). On October 25, 1950, the *118defendant board of appeals granted Lustig a waiver of the above restriction, permitting him to carry on such activities upon his premises for a period of two years. The plaintiff, as owner and occupant of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gregorio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Farr v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Culinary Institute of America, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.