Legal Opinion

Pixlee v. Petty

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 10, 1955No. 44285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

This is an action instituted by certain of the collateral kindred of William T. Pixlee, deceased, to partition described lands which had .been owned by decedent and which he had devised by his will of May 31, 1921. An issue of-title to. the described real estate was raised by the answer of defendant, Thomas J. Shoemaker, surviving husband of the sole surviving child of testator.

Defendant Shoemaker alleged himself to be “the owner in fee simple title and (that he) is entitled to the immediate possession of all the lands described in the petition, and that the same is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Norman v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Tindall v. TindallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Emmerson v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Sanders v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Palmer v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hereford v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, ETC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Hereford v. Unknown Heirs, Grantees or Successors of TholozanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Hess v. ProfferMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Kundert v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API