In Re the Personal Restraint of Plunkett

(dissenting)—I respectfully dissent. My primary disagreement is with the majority's interpretation of the meaning of "present", as that word is used in WAC 137-28-090(7), which provides:

Where institution staff members are witnesses against the inmate, every effort shall be made to have such witnesses present to testify at the hearing: Provided, however, The written statements of such staff members may be considered in their absence upon a showing of good cause.

*240The majority concludes that for purposes of this regulation, a witness who testifies by telephone is "present". I disagree.

Undefined…