State v. Frankfurth
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKapsner, Justice
[¶ 31] I agree with the conclusion that the district court did not err when it arrested judgment. For the crime of gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03(l)(c), “knowing” the victim was unaware of the sexual act is an element of an offense as defined by our legislature. N.D.C.C. § 12.1 — 01—03(l)(c). Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 7(c), this element must be in the information. Failure to charge an offense is a basis for an arrest of judgment under N.D.R.Crim.P. 34. I write separately to note my belief that this decision should not preclude district courts from analyzing the failure to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Ricco Devon PrentissCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.