Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Frankfurth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2005No. 20050112Published

1ConcurrenceKapsner, Justice

[¶ 31] I agree with the conclusion that the district court did not err when it arrested judgment. For the crime of gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03(l)(c), “knowing” the victim was unaware of the sexual act is an element of an offense as defined by our legislature. N.D.C.C. § 12.1 — 01—03(l)(c). Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 7(c), this element must be in the information. Failure to charge an offense is a basis for an arrest of judgment under N.D.R.Crim.P. 34. I write separately to note my belief that this decision should not preclude district courts from analyzing the failure to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Ricco Devon PrentissCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API