Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Jenson (In re Jenson)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1992No. 91-15479Published

1Concurring in the judgmentBeezer, Circuit Judge

The FDIC’s predecessor-in-interest sued Jenson for a deficiency judgment. The district court issued a writ of attachment in the deficiency action that attached Jenson’s one-third interest in a deed of trust and related promissory note. Pursuant to the writ of attachment, Jenson’s share of note payments were garnisheed and paid to the U.S. Marshal. By February 3, 1988, the note had been paid in full, and the U.S. Marshal possessed $554,225.86 in note payments. On July 1, 1988, Jenson filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. In these circumstances, I do not rely upon In re Wind Power Systems,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. In Re Wind Power Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. E.H. Beemer v. E.J. SeabornNevada Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API