Legal Opinion

E.H. Beemer v. E.J. Seaborn

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1933No. 3017PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

This action was instituted by E. H. Beemer, county clerk, as plaintiff, on December 12, 1932, against Riverside Bank, a corporation, to recover a money judgment. On motion, E. J. Seaborn, state bank examiner, was made a party defendant. Thereafter, other parties intervened. On the day the action wias commenced a writ of attachment was issued and placed in the hands of Russell Trathen, the sheriff, who undertook to levy upon cash and other personal property of the respondent bank, and made a return to the effect that he had attached said property.

In due time E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. PattenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
  2. Sanford v. BoringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Taintor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  4. Green v. HooperNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Baldwin v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re JensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Crystal Bay Corp. v. SchmittNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Jenson (In re Jenson)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API