State v. Dykstra
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C. J.
One issue is raised by this appeal: Should the State be barred from retrying defendant after the first trial ended in mistrial because the jury could not reach a verdict? After the State refiled the charges, the defendant's motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds was denied. The parties stipulated to a stay of the trial court proceedings and this court accepted discretionary review. We affirm, holding that under the facts of this case a retrial is not barred.
Defendant was tried for two counts of indecent liberties. Jury deliberations which totaled 13 V2 hours lasted 4 hours on day one,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BoogaardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ConnorsWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. Ralph Collins CawleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. DespenzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.