Legal Opinion

State v. Dykstra

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 13, 1983No. 6215-1-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C. J.

One issue is raised by this appeal: Should the State be barred from retrying defendant after the first trial ended in mistrial because the jury could not reach a verdict? After the State refiled the charges, the defendant's motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds was denied. The parties stipulated to a stay of the trial court proceedings and this court accepted discretionary review. We affirm, holding that under the facts of this case a retrial is not barred.

Defendant was tried for two counts of indecent liberties. Jury deliberations which totaled 13 V2 hours lasted 4 hours on day one,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BoogaardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. ConnorsWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. United States v. Ralph Collins CawleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State v. DespenzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API