Legal Opinion

Youmans v. Barry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1961No. 38929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. Plaintiff in error concedes that if the defendant in error’s deceased husband had the status of an invitee at the time he was injured in plaintiff in error’s automobile, the defendant in error could recover on the ground of You-mans’ ordinary negligence, rather than the gross negligence which would be required for a gratuitous guest. See Taylor v. Austin, 92 Ga. App. 104, 105 (88 SE2d 190); McBee v. Williamson, 96 Ga. App. 859 (2) (101 SE2d 910). “An invitee in an automobile to whom the duty to exercise ordinary care is owing is one who is invited to ride in the car in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Nash v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. McBee v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Taylor v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Varga v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Eason v. WeaverDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1974
  3. MacLoskie v. Royal Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  4. Durrett v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Durrett v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API