Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Durrett v. Farrar
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 29, 1973No. 48223, 48224, 48225, 48226Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEvans, Judge
D. C. Durrett furnished a Volkswagen automobile to his daughter, Debra Durrett, under the family purpose doctrine. There was evidence which showed that she had allowed others to drive the car with her father’s knowledge, and to which he made no objection. There was also evidence which showed that Debra loaned the car to Bruce Dangler and Charles Farrar to go and get some hamburgers and coffee for her and them; and that while Bruce Dangler was driving the car on this mission, it was wrecked and both Dangler and Farrar were killed. The mother of Charles Farrar brought an action for her son’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- McCurry v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.