Legal Opinion
Marrero v. Gober
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 30, 2000No. 99-624PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*81ORDER
2Per curiam
The pro se appellant appeals, on behalf of herself and her adult daughter, an April 6, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) that denied entitlement to retroactive apportionment of pension benefits that had been paid to the veteran while he was her husband and after their divorce. Record (R.) at 12. The appellant filed an informal brief, the Secretary filed a brief, and the appellant filed a reply to the Secretary’s brief. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction over the case pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons set forth below, the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Butts v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Terry A. Ledford, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Acting Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Clemment B. Epps, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- McLendon v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- William P. McLendon v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006