Legal Opinion

Howard Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 4, 1949No. 48874Published

1Opinion of the Court

83 F.Supp. 337 (1949)

HOWARD INDUSTRIES, Inc.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 48874.

United States Court of Claims.

April 4, 1949.

Raoul Berger, of Washington, D. C. (Gottlieb, Schwartz & Friedman, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Mary K. Fagan, of Washington, D. C., and H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Edgar T. Fell and Robert E. Mitchell, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN, and HOWELL, Judges.

HOWELL, Judge.

The defendant moves to dismiss the petition.

Plaintiff's action is brought under Public Law 657, 79th Cong., 2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Border Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Fogarty v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
  5. Stephens-Brown, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API