State v. Hill

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Renda Rene Hill appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found her guilty of forgery. She contends that the district court committed reversible error by failing to instruct the jury that a defendant could not be convicted solely on the testimony of an accomplice. Hill also asserts that the court erred in admitting certain documents into evidence and that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are taken from the evidence presented by the State at trial. Hill’s Mend, Shirley Beierle,…