Pilkanis v. Leesona Corporation
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.
This petition, although entitled “Employee’s Petition to Review and/or Amend Agreement or Decree Concerning Compensation,” is in reality a petition for specific compensation wherein the employee seeks benefits either under G. L. 1956, §28-33-19(1) as amended, for the complete loss of hearing in his left ear or alternatively, under §28-33-19 (m) as amended, for a percentage loss of hearing. It comes to us on the employee’s appeal from a final decree of the full commission affirming a decree of a single commissioner denying and dismissing the petition.
The record is short and the facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Travelers' Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Tracey v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
- Pan-American Life Ins. v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- Clark v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Volpe v. Stillman White Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Vouniseas's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- James River Corp. v. MaysCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.