Legal Opinion

Pilkanis v. Leesona Corporation

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 16, 1966No. Appeal No. 8PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.

This petition, although entitled “Employee’s Petition to Review and/or Amend Agreement or Decree Concerning Compensation,” is in reality a petition for specific compensation wherein the employee seeks benefits either under G. L. 1956, §28-33-19(1) as amended, for the complete loss of hearing in his left ear or alternatively, under §28-33-19 (m) as amended, for a percentage loss of hearing. It comes to us on the employee’s appeal from a final decree of the full commission affirming a decree of a single commissioner denying and dismissing the petition.

The record is short and the facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Travelers' Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Tracey v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
  3. Pan-American Life Ins. v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  4. Clark v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Volpe v. Stillman White Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Vouniseas's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. James River Corp. v. MaysCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API