Legal Opinion
Chippewa Dialysis v. Leavitt, Michael O.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 21, 2007No. 06-5371PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Claiming that their patients require atypieally high-cost dialysis services, three Michigan dialysis providers asked the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reimburse them at higher rates than Medicare normally pays for such services. The Secretary denied the requests, the district court granted summary judgment to the Secretary, and the providers now appeal. Among other things, they argue that the standard the Secretary used to assess treatment costs qualifies as an “interpretative rule,” “statement of policy,”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Syncor Intl Corp v. Shalala, Donna E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Monmouth Medical Center v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Proffitt v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Williams Gas Processing-Gulf Coast Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Catholic Health Initiatives v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Peaje Investments LLC v. Garcia-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Hugh Kaufman v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Water Quality Insurance Syndicate v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.