Doe v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
¶ 1 Jane Doe and the Gilbert Unified School District (“GUSD”) appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of the State of Arizona (the “State”). The trial court ruled, and we agree, that absolute immunity under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-820.01 (sometimes referred to herein as the “absolute immunity statute”) barred Doe’s claim against the State for its allegedly negligent approval of a teaching certificate application by a sexual offender who later molested her son.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 On February 24, 1999, Doe filed a complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fidelity Security Life Insurance v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Michael D. v. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Bird v. State Through CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greenwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008