Legal Opinion

Cushing v. Richardson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry M. Barney, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This action is based on a special taxbill issued for paving in the city of St. Joseph. The judgment in the trial court was for the plaintiff.

The points presented in favor of and against the validity of the bill are identical with those in the case of Rackliff v. Peters, 136 Mo. App. 168. The following statement made in that case will suffice for this:

“Under the charter of the city of St. Joseph public work of the nature of paving streets must be authorized by ordinance, duly ordained in accordance with the charter and framed as directed by the charter. It seems that prior to the year 1903 no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Sparks v. Knight Templars & Masonic Life Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. RACKLIFF v. PETERSMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huggins v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API