Legal Opinion

Lightstone v. Laurencel

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heydeneeldt

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

The note sued on is written in the Spanish language. The defendant Laurencel, is the maker. The other defendant, Sansevaine, expresses his liability by writing, in the Spanish language, the words, ‘ ‘Soy fiador la arriba expresada canUdad,” which, translated, means, “I am guarantor for the amount herein named.” The word “fiador,” according to Escriche, is defined to be, “he who undertakes for the obligation of another, taking upon himself the fulfillment thereof, in case of the non-compliance of the party contracting,”

This is, in effect, the definition of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riggs v. WaldoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sayre v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Bryan v. BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Robinson v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kritzer v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API