Legal Opinion
Unger v. Los Angeles Transit Lines
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1960No. Civ. 24317PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Defendant Los Angeles Transit Lines appeals from a default judgment in favor of plaintiff rendered in a personal injury action in the sum of $3,500. The default was entered because of defendant’s refusal and fail ure to answer certain interrogatories propounded by plaintiff pursuant to section 2030, Code of Civil Procedure.
That section provides, in subdivision (b) : “Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under subdivision (b) of Section 2016 of this code, and the answers may be used to the same extent as provided in subdivision (d) of Section 2016 of this code…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Associated Mortgage Investors v. G. P. Kent Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- MacDonald v. JoslynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.