Legal Opinion

Benson v. Adams

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1926No. 807-4469PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP," J.

This is a suit by James R. Adams, defendant in error, against Roy H. Benson and wife, plaintiffs in error, to recover the balance due on a promissory note executed by Benson to him, and to foreclose a mortgage on personal property given to secure payment thereof. Plaintiffs in error in their answer denied under oath that Benson executed the note sued on, and alleged that said note had been mutilated and materially altered fraudulently by Adams after it was executed and delivered, in that the place of payment as stated in said note, to wit, “at Plano,” had been erased, and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth v. . PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Vogle v. RipperIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. White v. HassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  5. Clough v. SeaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curlee Clothing Co. v. WickliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Community Natural Gas Co. v. Northern Texas Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Denny v. White House Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API