Legal Opinion
Tompkins v. Cyr
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 7, 1998No. 3:94-cv-00973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Norman T. Tompkins and Carolyn Tompkins obtained an $8.5 million verdict against eleven abortion protestors after a jury trial. Three motions remain pending before the Court: (1) defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law; (2) plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the verdict; and (3) plaintiffs’ motion for injunctive relief. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the verdict are granted in part and denied in part.…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Osterberg v. PecaTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Peavy v. HarmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
- Ross v. EarlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Marilyn Olmer v. City of LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Marilyn Olmer v. City of LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.