Legal Opinion
State v. Cardona
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 8, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
248 N.J. Super. 311 (1991)
590 A.2d 1220
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ISMAEL CARDONA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal), Hudson County.
Decided March 8, 1991.
Thomas Foti for plaintiff (Paul M. DePascale, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney).
Carl Broege for defendant (Patricia M. Kay, Hudson County Public Defender, attorney).
COSTELLO, J.S.C.
The court is faced with a case of first impression in the State of New Jersey: is a defendant's statement that he was financially unable to pay for an attorney an ambiguous request for counsel?
In the early morning hours of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CardonaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993