Legal Opinion
Ziskend v. O'LEARY
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 10, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-10810-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff Alan Ziskend (“Ziskend”) brings this suit against Brookline’s Chief of Police, Daniel O’Leary (“O’Leary”) in his individual capacity, alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 In Count I of his complaint, Ziskend alleges that O’Leary retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment rights by dismissing him as an auxiliary police officer after Ziskend brought suit against O’Leary and the Town of Brookline. In Count II, Ziskend alleges that he was dismissed in violation of his rights to due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barton v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Tullo v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Gonzalez Pina v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003