Roberts v. Huddleston
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
— These parties were heirs of Hiram Huddleston, Sr., and distributees under his will. The appellee had a claim against the testator’s estate large enough to cover all that was left after payment of debts, which was only $227.12. The claim was duly filed, and was opposed by some of the heirs. The appellee then bought out the interests of all the heirs except the appellant. He claimed that she had no interest; that she had received all of her share, so that the entire surplus belonged to him, in his own right and by purchase from said other heirs. r
After making said purchase the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. MathiasIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Scotten v. State ex rel. SimontonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Sparks v. HeritageIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Van Vacter v. M'KillipIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Sherwood v. ThomassonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re Lambert's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
- Pfaffenberger v. PlatterIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State Ex Rel. Crawford v. Howard Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.