Lohmann v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This is an eminent domain case. Judgment was rendered upon the jury verdict. Defendants have brought this appeal. The parties will be referred to here as petitioner and defendants, as in the trial court.
Defendants’ first series of points of error attack the authority of petitioner to condemn the land in question for the purpose of constructing and operating a gas pipeline, because petitioner is not a common carrier and the permit granted by the Federal Power Commission (hereinafter referred to as the F.P.C.) is invalid for a number of reasons. As grounds for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Luby v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Tennessee Gas & Transmission Co. v. ZirjacksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Jones v. City of MineolaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Texas Electric Service Company v. LineberyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Ludewig v. Houston Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- City of Austin v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Valero Eastex Pipeline Co. v. Jarvis, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996
- Jenkins v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.