Legal Opinion

State v. Riddle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1990No. 23196PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Amended Opinion Number 23127, 387 S.E. (2d) 455, is vacated, and the following substituted in its place.

Appellant, Bruce Eugene Riddle (Riddle) contends the Circuit Court erred in permitting an amendment to his indictment during the course of trial. We agree and reverse.

Riddle was indicted for assault with intent to commit third degree criminal sexual conduct. At the close of evidence, the indictment was amended to charge assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct. The sole issue we address is whether the amendment was proper.

S.C. Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hope v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Granger v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API