Legal Opinion

State v. Guthrie

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 2002No. 3560PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Brent P. Guthrie was convicted of first degree burglary. On appeal, he contends the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the State improperly amended his indictment at trial. We reverse.

*106 FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Guthrie, Mark Veit, and Jerry Lambert broke into Ed Tannery’s fishing cabin during the evening sometime between January 13 and January 15, 1999. The three men removed beer, a tackle box, fishing rods, and several other items from the cabin. They filled their truck with these items, deposited them in Veit’s hotel room, and returned to the cabin a second…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. MeansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Town of Hilton Head Island v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API