Olds v. Alvord
Supreme Court of Florida
1Concurrence · ThomasThomas, J.
(concurring specially). — I took no part in the consideration of this ease until the matter was presented on motion to vacate the order granting a rehearing.
My view was that the court had lost jurisdiction of the cause and that the motion to vacate was well founded. That motion lost by a divided opinion of the Court. Thus, it was necessary to study the merits of the cause. From knowledge *783gained by my examination and from the argument last presented, I concur in the opinion by Mr. Justice Buford.
Whitfield, J.
The order granting a rehearing is procedural only. It merely permits a re-argument of…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Buford.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Griffith v. AlcockeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal, Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Foster v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.