Legal Opinion
GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OY
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 30, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00071Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION GREE, INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:19-cv-00071-JRG-RSP § SUPERCELL OY, § § Defendant. § § MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff GREE, Inc. (“GREE”) filed a motion (“Motion”) to strike Defendant Supercell Oy’s (“Supercell”) affirmative defense of invalidity (Dkt. No. 20), which is now before the Court.1 In this Motion, GREE asks the Court to find that Supercell is estopped under 35 U.S.C. § 325(e)(2) from raising the affirmative defense of invalidity of the patent-at-issue in this case. GREE argues that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Virginia Woodfield, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Third Party v. Charlie Bowman, Planet Insurance Co., Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.