Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 2014No. 1110620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

Sarah Janie Hicks petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment affirming her conviction, following a guilty plea, for chemical endangerment of a child for exposing her unborn child to a controlled substance, in violation of Alabama’s chemical-endangerment statute, § 26-15-3.2(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975. We granted her petition, and we now affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and hold that the use of the word “child” in the chemical-endangerment statute includes all children, born and unborn, and furthers Alabama’s…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Energy and Policy Institute v. Drummond Company, Inc.; Balch & Bingham, LLP; David Roberson; and Anna Roberson (Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-19-901210).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API