Legal Opinion

United States v. Guest

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1935No. 188PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

There is ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict that the defendant devised a fraudulent scheme and used the mails for the purpose of carrying it out. Under assumed names he hired the privilege of having mail delivered at an office on Fifth avenue, and later at 276 West Forty-Third street, New York City. To this address he invited his intended victims to send a deposit of money, accompanied by an order blank for garments to be worked on at home, promising to return the deposit and pay for the work when it should be completed. Having received their letters, he neither sent the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. KenofskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Demolli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jerome D. Linden, Robert R. Baylis, Classified Business Directory, Inc., and Directory Listings, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Estate of Wood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Harold W. Marvin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. Raymond L. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Holdsworth v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API